|
| Re: Mail from lunchbox. [message #7712 is a reply to message #7247] |
Thu, 01 October 2009 23:45   |
|
I don't think I'm overreacting, I honestly don't see why we need mods like baker who delete every last one of another user's posts.
Or ones with personal grudges willing to abuse their power, and I'm not even talking about lunchbox. I like variety as well but it's just stupid having a bunch of mods like that when all we need is a couple to clean up kommisar's mess once in awhile.
|
|
|
| Re: Mail from lunchbox. [message #7720 is a reply to message #7712] |
Fri, 02 October 2009 02:04 |
 Playa11 
Messages: 578
Registered: May 2008
Location: slave |
Drenched |
|
|
| fish wrote on Thu, 01 October 2009 17:45 |
I don't think I'm overreacting, I honestly don't see why we need mods like baker who delete every last one of another user's posts.
Or ones with personal grudges willing to abuse their power, and I'm not even talking about lunchbox. I like variety as well but it's just stupid having a bunch of mods like that when all we need is a couple to clean up kommisar's mess once in awhile.
|
Baker is actually doing his god damn job, unlike the other slacker mods. Not that it really MATTERS, who the fuck mods a small little internet community, that's filled with nothing but baww, drama, faggots, a bitch, and a little more drama.
Sorry but DJ deleting Gardy's posts, ISN'T that fucking big of a deal. Drop it faggots, and carry on.
|
|
|
| Re: Mail from lunchbox. [message #7722 is a reply to message #7720] |
Fri, 02 October 2009 02:09 |
 |
Bitch
Messages: 1369
Registered: January 2009
Location: Rhode Island |
Saturated
Soopah |
|
|
| Playa11 wrote on Fri, 02 October 2009 01:04 |
that's filled with nothing but baww, drama, faggots, a bitch, and a little more drama.
|
| fish wrote on Thu, 01 October 2009 22:45 |
I don't think I'm overreacting, I honestly don't see why we need mods like baker who delete every last one of another user's posts.
Or ones with personal grudges willing to abuse their power, and I'm not even talking about lunchbox. I like variety as well but it's just stupid having a bunch of mods like that when all we need is a couple to clean up kommisar's mess once in awhile.
|
Good thing Shi made me a mod of the lesser sub forums like FuckMails and WetFiction, otherwise I would probably edit Kommisar's posts back to their original state after a moderator changed it. Though I do abuse my power by randomly editing things... Not fot the lulz, but because I am bored and it sounded like a good idea at the time.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mail from lunchbox. [message #7738 is a reply to message #7735] |
Fri, 02 October 2009 15:05 |
traces
Messages: 709
Registered: July 2008
Location: in my pants |
Drenched
Elephant Saviour |
|
|
| fish wrote on Fri, 02 October 2009 10:54 |
GET OUT already, playa11
|
we'll outlive you, don't worry
T-T-T-TUNA FISH
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mail from lunchbox. [message #7769 is a reply to message #7247] |
Sun, 04 October 2009 01:34 |
|
So fish. You honestly think that it is a big deal at all to remove like 50+ posts that are nothing at all but "shut up fag"? Because if I had seen more than like 2-3 posts that were actually trying to take place within the conversation rather than smearing insults then I would have ceased deletion. Now I am sure that your opinion will not differ from these words seeing as how you are just biased to a myopic view, but I stand by my actions. The fact that shi has seen full well what I did there and decided not to remove my status should be all that anyone needs.
I warned taokaka to stop the flaming and play nice, he decided not to. I then started deleting a few of his flames and realized the depth of it. By the time I came upon something that was not in violation of any rules it seemed rediculous not to further the "punishment" if you can even call it that. He is not banned from these forums and I will not touch any more of his posts if they remain clean. Nobody else has even come close to testing my resolve as a forum moderator like Mr. Ihateeveryone. So you are all safe from that fate. Everyone else has contributed enough to the forums in civil chat that it would take a MASSIVE flame fest to get me to bust out that hammer again. And by massive I mean, posting 100+ flames in a row with no support as to why you are flaming.
TL;DR nou
TL;DR TL;DR
I'm a fag with opinions.
[Updated on: Wed, 07 October 2009 22:27] by Moderator
 |
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mail from lunchbox. [message #7835 is a reply to message #7769] |
Wed, 07 October 2009 03:12 |
|
| Djbaker wrote on Sun, 04 October 2009 00:34 |
So fish. You honestly think that it is a big deal at all to remove like 50+ posts that are nothing at all but "shut up fag"? Because if I had seen more than like 2-3 posts that were actually trying to take place within the conversation rather than smearing insults then I would have ceased deletion. Now I am sure that your opinion will not differ from these words seeing as how you are just biased to a myopic view, but I stand by my actions. The fact that shi has seen full well what I did there and decided not to remove my status should be all that anyone needs.
I warned taokaka to stop the flaming and play nice, he decided not to. I then started deleting a few of his flames and realized the depth of it. By the time I came upon something that was not in violation of any rules it seemed rediculous not to further the "punishment" if you can even call it that. He is not banned from these forums and I will not touch any more of his posts if they remain clean. Nobody else has even come close to testing my resolve as a forum moderator like Mr. Ihateeveryone. So you are all safe from that fate. Everyone else has contributed enough to the forums in civil chat that it would take a MASSIVE flame fest to get me to bust out that hammer again. And by massive I mean, posting 100+ flames in a row with no support as to why you are flaming.
TL;DR nou
|
I don't approve of moderation of what other people say just because they offend you. And I know it wasn't all just "shut up fag"
jk
I wouldn't wanna have to see you "bust out your hammer" on me ^__________
TL;DR
I'm a fag with opinions.
[Updated on: Wed, 07 October 2009 22:25] by Moderator
 |
|
|
| Re: Mail from lunchbox. [message #7901 is a reply to message #7247] |
Mon, 12 October 2009 16:36 |
|
I'll just keep going until you're all nothing but ashes and then I can laugh as you blow away and become nothing, for that is all that you are worth, nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mail from lunchbox. [message #7960 is a reply to message #7247] |
Wed, 14 October 2009 15:15 |
|
Editing posts for lulz is retarted. Like I said. When you edit and delete posts, and before we see them and someone has already replied, it makes it hard to follow the thread. MODS R FAGS.
That is all.
lol i edit ur postz
[Updated on: Wed, 14 October 2009 16:37] by Moderator
|
|
|
| Re: Mail from lunchbox. [message #8521 is a reply to message #7712] |
Mon, 02 November 2009 19:46 |
|
| fish wrote on Thu, 01 October 2009 22:45 |
it's just stupid having a bunch of mods like that when all we need is a couple to clean up kommisar's mess once in awhile.
|
[Updated on: Tue, 03 November 2009 03:07] by Moderator
"Quantity has a quality all its own"
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mail from lunchbox. [message #12107 is a reply to message #7247] |
Mon, 12 April 2010 04:06 |
|
More like:
Cat- the gay one
Lunboks- the gay one
Bitch- the gay one
Tosi- the gay one
Dark- the gay one
Dj- the gay one
Lana- the gay one
Bitch wrote on Sun, 13 September 2009 23:37Who can resist you when you say things all cute like... Well, like "shut up ugly!"
Gets me every time!
As for this moderation editations business, I think it's secretly meant to help us understand each other better. Since we know we can't always trust that a person's post is even their own words, we have to really make an attempt at understanding each other in order to be able to tell if what was said was that person speaking or not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mail from lunchbox. [message #12242 is a reply to message #12241] |
Wed, 14 April 2010 05:42 |
|
IsabellaSage wrote on Wed, 14 April 2010 03:55I'm so embarassed...
You should be embarrassed for misspelling embarrassed.
This is why we can't have nice things!
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mail from lunchbox. [message #12245 is a reply to message #12242] |
Wed, 14 April 2010 06:19 |
|
Ember wrote on Wed, 14 April 2010 04:42IsabellaSage wrote on Wed, 14 April 2010 03:55I'm so embarassed...
You should be embarrassed for misspelling embarrassed.
*cries*
|
|
|
| Re: Mail from lunchbox. [message #12246 is a reply to message #12245] |
Wed, 14 April 2010 06:27 |
traces
Messages: 709
Registered: July 2008
Location: in my pants |
Drenched
Elephant Saviour |
|
|
Toggle SpoilerIsabellaSage wrote on Wed, 14 April 2010 06:19Ember wrote on Wed, 14 April 2010 04:42IsabellaSage wrote on Wed, 14 April 2010 03:55I'm so embarassed...
You should be embarrassed for misspelling embarrassed.
*cries*
T-T-T-TUNA FISH
|
|
|
Members
Calendar
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
E-mail to friend 
nah the drama one 
]